How Justin works
Justin's starting point is the client's objective, not the procedure. Before recommending a step he wants to know what a good outcome looks like: payment, an injunction, a settlement on defensible terms, or simply a clear exit. The strategy is built backwards from that.
He works from the documents. Contracts, correspondence, bank records and, in digital-asset matters, on-chain data are read early and closely, because the strength of a case is usually decided by what is written down rather than by what each side remembers.
Clients describe him as calm and direct. He says where a case is weak as plainly as where it is strong, and he stays personally on the matter from the first call through to enforcement.
Matters Justin handles
- Commercial and contractual claims, from letter of demand to judgment and enforcement
- Shareholder, director, and company control disputes
- Fraud, conspiracy, and asset-tracing claims
- Cryptocurrency and digital-asset disputes, including freezing and recovery
- CIPAA adjudication and construction payment disputes
- Arbitration and the enforcement of awards
- Employment disputes before the Industrial Court
- Injunctions, summary judgment, and appeals
- Regulatory advice for digital-asset, fintech, and Web3 businesses
From the practice
Plain-language notes on the questions Justin’s clients ask most.
- EmploymentEmployee vs Independent Contractor in Malaysia: What's the Difference?
- Digital AssetsIs Cryptocurrency Legal in Malaysia?
- Disputes & LitigationBankruptcy Notice in Malaysia: What to Do Within 7 Days
- EmploymentSexual Harassment at Work in Malaysia: Your Rights and Your Employer's Duties
- CIPAA AdjudicationCIPAA Adjudication Timeline in Malaysia: From Payment Claim to Decision
- Disputes & LitigationCan I Be Made Bankrupt in Malaysia? The RM100,000 Rule Explained

